This week we learned that the European Commission is hoping to pass a law which will require all device manufacturers to fit their smartphones with USB-C charging ports. For Android phones this is mostly already a done deal and moving to USB-C for any stragglers will not be a big deal. However for Apple, things are not as simple. While the company has deployed USB-C to the iPad and MacBook ranges, smartphones are another matter (AirPods less of a problem, realistically they use Lightning because the iPhone does).
And while it’s not my job to defend Apple, I’ve been thinking about this problem and what the EU is hoping to achieve, and the problems that lie in the way. Firstly, it is laudable that we move towards less e-waste but I suspect stopping Apple using Lightning won’t be much help. Let’s think for a moment about just how many Lightning cables there are in the world right now. Estimates on how many iPhones there are range from around 1.9 to 2.2 billion since the device first went on sale. Of those, quite a few carry lightning, and virtually every one of the still-in-use devices is likely to be using the port.
The iPhone 5 was Apple’s first Lightning-equipped phone so, we’ve had basically a decade of Lightning now. That could be as many as a billion devices which use lightning cables. And with the iPhone getting support for 5 years or so after launch it’s reasonable to expect that people will be using lightning for a few years to come. That means we already have a really significant collection of these cables that will, at some point, have to be thrown away or, perhaps, recycled.
This surely means that considerable harm will be done by forcing Apple to move to USB-C. It will means people will almost certainly need to replace their existing cables, especially if they have a collection of Lightning cables that they use to top up their phone wherever they are. It’s hard to see how enforcing such a change would decrease the amount of cables in the world.
It’s also worth pointing out that while Apple draws criticism from a lot of places for the whacky Lightning connector, it is actually a fairly decent cable system. It appeared way before USB-C but offers the same reversibility that people enjoy over the the meme-like idiocy of prior USB standards. It’s pretty resilient, I’ve never bent one for example, but I certainly have damaged a USB-C connector. Apple’s cables might be expensive, but unless abused they tend to last many, many years.
At the time it was introduced, Lightning was faster and more reliable than micro-USB and was clearly a more elegant solution for iPhones. Had Apple decided to make it an open standard, I think there’s a good chance it would have ended up being the connection on every phone.
The fact that Lightning is still around now is a testament to its cunning design. I don’t doubt its time is over. USB-C is, without doubt, the future and even Apple seems to understand that. A lot of its hardware has already moved on and into the open arms of USB-C. This isn’t as big a deal as many people might think, rumours suggest Apple was deeply involved in the development of USB-C. John Gruber, someone with good Apple connections, once claimed the company was entirely responsible for its design.
Sign up to the T3 newsletter for smarter living straight to your inbox
Get all the latest news, reviews, deals and buying guides on gorgeous tech, home and active products from the T3 experts
Whatever the truth is about Apple’s internal feelings toward USB-C, it’s pretty obvious that Lightning isn’t long for this world. It’s given us years of solid service and I think we should at least give it some grudging respect for being ahead of the game in technological terms. When the move away from it happens there will be a lot of pairs of Apple headphones, power cables and third party accessories rendered useless. For all the EU’s good intentions, that move will create a mountain of e-waste all of its own.
Ian has been involved in technology journalism since 2007, originally writing about AV hardware back when LCDs and plasma TVs were just gaining popularity. Nearly 15 years on, he remains as excited about how tech can make your life better.
-
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra said to beat iPhone in one key area
It's a slim margin, but it looks like Samsung could win out
By Sam Cross Published
-
Dior celebrates the Year of the Snake with a rose gold lunar-inspired watch
Dior gives its Grand Soir watch a Year of the Snake-inspired design
By Bethan Girdler-Maslen Published
-
iOS 18.2 upgrade – here's how to get Apple Intelligence on your iPhone
Apple has released its iOS 18.2 upgrade, bringing a range of new features to your iPhone. Discover how to get the features and what to expect
By Mat Gallagher Published
-
As most phones get bigger, iPhone 17 is set to shrink one major Apple feature
The Dynamic Island looks set to lose some territory
By Sam Cross Published
-
Your older iPhone is about to lose an essential feature forever
If you don't have a modern iPhone, it may be time to upgrade
By Sam Cross Published
-
iPhone SE 4 could be a cheaper iPhone 15, insiders claim
The same sensor as the iPhone 15 and the same processor as the iPhone 16? This is getting interesting
By Carrie Marshall Published
-
One of next summer's most exciting sci-fi blockbusters has been shot on an iPhone
Danny Boyle is sticking to the basics
By Max Freeman-Mills Published
-
Apple's iOS 18 is available now – here's why you should update your iPhone today
This free update for your iPhone brings a ton of new features even to older iPhone models
By Mat Gallagher Published
-
Your iPhone or iPad might lose Netflix soon – here's why
Netflix is dropping some support
By Max Freeman-Mills Published
-
5 reasons you should choose Vodafone when you buy your next smartphone
With a new iPhone on its way, there’s only one network you should opt for
By T3.com Published